JA1HIND
02-06 08:34 AM
It looks as though they have updated their page. Previously they were suggesting people apply 180 days in advance.
You are right a month ago it used to say 180 days as I have a print out and now it say's 120 days...since we are dealing with notorious USCIS who are very popular of doing such silent updates and there won't be any track of updated time stamp or date stamp anywhere on this website...(which is another useless page) I guess they do it on purpose and not sure if you remember recently how they changed dates for NSC & TSC for 140 processing dates etc....
You are right a month ago it used to say 180 days as I have a print out and now it say's 120 days...since we are dealing with notorious USCIS who are very popular of doing such silent updates and there won't be any track of updated time stamp or date stamp anywhere on this website...(which is another useless page) I guess they do it on purpose and not sure if you remember recently how they changed dates for NSC & TSC for 140 processing dates etc....
wallpaper Justin Bieber
sandiboy
07-20 02:50 PM
maybe this question has been asked before, I just couldn't find the thread.
These days with tons and tons of I-485 applications received every morning, how is USCIS gonna decide which one to process first?
If it's strictly on "first received, first processed" base, then it may well be that one guy with 3/07 PD date may have his application processed earlier (thus earlier AP and EAD) than one with 5/06 PD date. Simply because the 3/07 PD guy sent out the package much earlier than the 5/06 PD one.
Do I understand correctly?
Is this fair, though?
There is already a thread open for it. Please read it.
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=10428
Moderator, please close this thread
These days with tons and tons of I-485 applications received every morning, how is USCIS gonna decide which one to process first?
If it's strictly on "first received, first processed" base, then it may well be that one guy with 3/07 PD date may have his application processed earlier (thus earlier AP and EAD) than one with 5/06 PD date. Simply because the 3/07 PD guy sent out the package much earlier than the 5/06 PD one.
Do I understand correctly?
Is this fair, though?
There is already a thread open for it. Please read it.
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=10428
Moderator, please close this thread
sparklinks
07-19 09:28 PM
If it is new 485 filing then you don't have A#.
A# on I-140 is nothing do with your 485.
A# on I-140 is nothing do with your 485.
2011 hot justin bieber pictures
amsimmegrant
06-26 02:02 PM
i have working on h1b with compant A. i got a job offer from company B ( a consulting company) for a third party client. i sent company B my H1b tranfer papers . i didn't signed any offer letter or agreement with company b till now. company B filed LCA for me and before they field for h1B transfer , i changed my mind and informed company B that i am not going to join them. now company B threatning me that they will sue me for the damages and fees they spent and put a stay on me so that i can not work for any other employer while the case is in court of law . i have all my personal and other information with them as i sent them all the documents for H1B transfer. there is no offer letter and agreement signed between us and it was only verbal communication apart from some E mail exchanges and documents sent for transfer of visa. any body please advice does company B can create any problems or file any suit againt me . what are my rights ? i am still working for company A and don't want to get into any trouble..
i have working on h1b with compant A. i got a job offer from company B ( a consulting company) for a third party client. i sent company B my H1b tranfer papers . i didn't signed any offer letter or agreement with company b till now. company B filed LCA for me and before they field for h1B transfer , i changed my mind and informed company B that i am not going to join them. now company B threatning me that they will sue me for the damages and fees they spent and put a stay on me so that i can not work for any other employer while the case is in court of law . i have all my personal and other information with them as i sent them all the documents for H1B transfer. there is no offer letter and agreement signed between us and it was only verbal communication apart from some E mail exchanges and documents sent for transfer of visa. any body please advice does company B can create any problems or file any suit againt me . what are my rights ? i am still working for company A and don't want to get into any trouble..
thanks in advance for any advice ...
i have working on h1b with compant A. i got a job offer from company B ( a consulting company) for a third party client. i sent company B my H1b tranfer papers . i didn't signed any offer letter or agreement with company b till now. company B filed LCA for me and before they field for h1B transfer , i changed my mind and informed company B that i am not going to join them. now company B threatning me that they will sue me for the damages and fees they spent and put a stay on me so that i can not work for any other employer while the case is in court of law . i have all my personal and other information with them as i sent them all the documents for H1B transfer. there is no offer letter and agreement signed between us and it was only verbal communication apart from some E mail exchanges and documents sent for transfer of visa. any body please advice does company B can create any problems or file any suit againt me . what are my rights ? i am still working for company A and don't want to get into any trouble..
thanks in advance for any advice ...
more...
waitnwatch
09-11 11:13 AM
Two questions for the experts...
I am on J1 visa and have received a home residency requirement waiver. Do the experts here know if I can apply for a J1 visa extension (after receiving the waiver)? I read somewhere that it may not be possible to do so.
Also, are there are any foreign travel restriction on a J-1 visa?
Thanks
Getting a waiver implies that you want to change your status. So renewal may not be a good idea. I would talk to a lawyer about the implications.
I am on J1 visa and have received a home residency requirement waiver. Do the experts here know if I can apply for a J1 visa extension (after receiving the waiver)? I read somewhere that it may not be possible to do so.
Also, are there are any foreign travel restriction on a J-1 visa?
Thanks
Getting a waiver implies that you want to change your status. So renewal may not be a good idea. I would talk to a lawyer about the implications.
MTsoul
04-22 06:56 PM
Wow the second one and the fourth one look great! Keep it up!
more...
ajju
03-21 07:22 PM
Hi All
I got a RFE on my Substitute 140 ( PD is 2005) where they are asking for 2007 tax returns which are not filed yet, applied for extension. 2005 and 2006 tax returns are good.
Can someone suggest me what to do in this situation.
Any suggestions or any format leters...etc
Please suggest
Thanks
Looks like "Ability to Pay"... So they need company's tax returns... 140 is company's document not yours... But you mentioned your 2007 tax returns being extended.. Are you the company??
I got a RFE on my Substitute 140 ( PD is 2005) where they are asking for 2007 tax returns which are not filed yet, applied for extension. 2005 and 2006 tax returns are good.
Can someone suggest me what to do in this situation.
Any suggestions or any format leters...etc
Please suggest
Thanks
Looks like "Ability to Pay"... So they need company's tax returns... 140 is company's document not yours... But you mentioned your 2007 tax returns being extended.. Are you the company??
2010 Justin Bieber Vanity Fair
Green_Always
07-30 09:32 PM
mubarak ho..
more...
satishg
09-16 08:35 PM
In september my dates became current and my GC and my spouse GC has been approved . However my lawyer recieved interview notices for me and my wife. What should be the next step. Ignore the notices as we recieved the Green card or do we need to attend the interview.
hair Justin Bieber Vanity Fair
prouddesi
10-10 03:00 PM
San Diegan IV members,
There is a conference call on Friday, October 12 at 9:30 pm. Details are on the yahoo groups.
We are looking for your valuable suggestions and help in upcoming IV flyer drive and booth events so please join us in making this happen!
Please join So Cal State Chapter (via the link in my signature) if you have not done so already.
Thanks!
San Diego Coordinators
There is a conference call on Friday, October 12 at 9:30 pm. Details are on the yahoo groups.
We are looking for your valuable suggestions and help in upcoming IV flyer drive and booth events so please join us in making this happen!
Please join So Cal State Chapter (via the link in my signature) if you have not done so already.
Thanks!
San Diego Coordinators
more...
jaggubhai
05-18 12:49 AM
Snathan, thanks for the reply.
One of my friends told me that now a days Universities send info about all foreign students to USCIS database. I am just concerned if i say No and if the data shows up on IO's computer that she is taking classes, wouldn't that be a problem?
Please let me know your opinion.
Thanks again.
One of my friends told me that now a days Universities send info about all foreign students to USCIS database. I am just concerned if i say No and if the data shows up on IO's computer that she is taking classes, wouldn't that be a problem?
Please let me know your opinion.
Thanks again.
hot justin-ieber-vanity-fair.jpg
martinvisalaw
02-17 03:17 PM
It's really impossible to answer this without knowing the exact employment relationship that is planned and what the denial said in detail. Presumably your employer has a lawyer who can advise on whether an appeal might be successful. It is very likely that the denial was based on there not being the correct "employer-employee" relationship. CIS issued a new memo on this last month, and there are many threads in this forum on the topic. See here also: Law Office of Elaine Martin - immigration news: consultants (http://martinvisalaw.blogspot.com/search/label/consultants).
Good luck.
Good luck.
more...
house justin bieber vanity fair
chanduv23
11-14 07:53 PM
^^^^^^^^^^^^
tattoo hot justin bieber pictures
tdasara
03-06 04:03 PM
The use of H1b is extensive just to promote false news....
H1b and Greencards are used in the same context. Many 'technology' magazines don't like either GC's or H1b's.
GC process is a 'fair' atleast when it comes to prevailing wage and so they quote 'H1b' quite often to build up their case.
H1b and Greencards are used in the same context. Many 'technology' magazines don't like either GC's or H1b's.
GC process is a 'fair' atleast when it comes to prevailing wage and so they quote 'H1b' quite often to build up their case.
more...
pictures Justin Bieber Vanity Fair
a_yaja
06-26 10:15 AM
There is no issue if your wife is the derivative applicant and gets her EAD through you. You can also start but it is more complicated since your business has to be doing excatly the same thing as your labor application. Also, i think you should get lawyers advice if you are starting it. There is no complication for your wife to start a business.
T
The business started by you need not be the same as in your labor application as long as you maintain your job with current employer or you switch to a similar job. For example, you can start a company for renting real estate without any problem as long as you can show that your job as stated in the LCA still exists ow will exist when the GC is approved.
T
The business started by you need not be the same as in your labor application as long as you maintain your job with current employer or you switch to a similar job. For example, you can start a company for renting real estate without any problem as long as you can show that your job as stated in the LCA still exists ow will exist when the GC is approved.
dresses justin bieber vanity fair
cdeneo
01-12 06:51 PM
I don't believe leaving the company that you had signed an I-9 form with have any impact on your GC app as long as you have a same or a similar job lined up if and when you do get an RFE regarding the same.
As mentioned several times, GC is for future employment and you can switch employers as many times as you want under AC21 (of course you don't want to go overboard with switching employers every few months either :)).
I hope this helps - again this is my understanding of the law and not a legal opinion.
Does the I9 form that we sign with our company have any impact on our 485 processing if we leave the company using AC21.
Thank you.
As mentioned several times, GC is for future employment and you can switch employers as many times as you want under AC21 (of course you don't want to go overboard with switching employers every few months either :)).
I hope this helps - again this is my understanding of the law and not a legal opinion.
Does the I9 form that we sign with our company have any impact on our 485 processing if we leave the company using AC21.
Thank you.
more...
makeup Justin Bieber Vanity Fair
anilsal
06-16 11:45 PM
Hello
Thank you for your time and I appreciate your effort.
Scenario:
I have two Approved I-140s (both filed by same company).
• Filed I-140 & I-485 concurrently with a PD of Nov 2007 (Original Labor) - I-140 Approved and I-485 Pending
• Filed I-140 with PD March 2005 (Substitution Labor) - I-140 Approved.
Questions:
1. I would greatly appreciate if you can let me know what are my options and any relative information (Letter formats etc.)
2. Can Info-Pass work instead of writing to USCIS?
1) Send letters to the service center explaining your situation and the priority dates + 140 approval LIN#(NSC) or WAC# or whichever approval numbers you have. You need to stress that your dates are current and that your AOS applications have to be approved based on the current 140 (irrespective of which approved 140, the 485 apps were filed).
2) Send faxes same as the letter.
3) Call the NSC/TSC IOs. (If you reach the national customer service center, no luck).
4) Take Infopass.
One of the above options will work.
Thank you for your time and I appreciate your effort.
Scenario:
I have two Approved I-140s (both filed by same company).
• Filed I-140 & I-485 concurrently with a PD of Nov 2007 (Original Labor) - I-140 Approved and I-485 Pending
• Filed I-140 with PD March 2005 (Substitution Labor) - I-140 Approved.
Questions:
1. I would greatly appreciate if you can let me know what are my options and any relative information (Letter formats etc.)
2. Can Info-Pass work instead of writing to USCIS?
1) Send letters to the service center explaining your situation and the priority dates + 140 approval LIN#(NSC) or WAC# or whichever approval numbers you have. You need to stress that your dates are current and that your AOS applications have to be approved based on the current 140 (irrespective of which approved 140, the 485 apps were filed).
2) Send faxes same as the letter.
3) Call the NSC/TSC IOs. (If you reach the national customer service center, no luck).
4) Take Infopass.
One of the above options will work.
girlfriend justin bieber vanity fair
kirupa
11-18 04:34 AM
Sure, let me dig a few of them up!
hairstyles Justin Bieber Dominates Vanity
ashutrip
09-06 12:17 AM
my HR & corporate Lawyer
cellphone
01-04 06:03 PM
May be it is worth it or may be not....In www.cnn.com there is a section (on the left hand side) asking what the democrats should do first. (They are basically asking our opinion)
I wrote down some items that I thought they should discuss, namely, in the area of legal immigration relief for EB categories.
We probably wont gain anything out of it; at the same time, it doesnt hurt to send them our opinion.
what say you ????
I wrote down some items that I thought they should discuss, namely, in the area of legal immigration relief for EB categories.
We probably wont gain anything out of it; at the same time, it doesnt hurt to send them our opinion.
what say you ????
die_exquisita
07-07 02:45 AM
Hello,
I came across this particular requirement in VFS website for a H4 applicant:
'letter from employer that describes the relationship with the Principal Applicant and the purpose of travel'
I would really appreciate it if anybody has a sample of the same or an inkling as to what exactly it is (as far as I know, the employer can provide an employment verification letter, but not stating that the spouse is applying for a dependent visa and so on).
Thank you for your time and help!
I came across this particular requirement in VFS website for a H4 applicant:
'letter from employer that describes the relationship with the Principal Applicant and the purpose of travel'
I would really appreciate it if anybody has a sample of the same or an inkling as to what exactly it is (as far as I know, the employer can provide an employment verification letter, but not stating that the spouse is applying for a dependent visa and so on).
Thank you for your time and help!
